Taking Back America

…one post at a time

Tag Archives: Crooked Hillary

Video: ‘Gays’ off rooftops cracks up Hillary

WND
By Bob Unruh | 20 October 2016

Clinton laughs when Trump highlights horrific deaths at hands of Islamists

hillarlysmile

Hillary Clinton multiple times has smiled broadly or even laughed at a statement from Donald Trump during the three presidential campaign debates – and people are left to draw their own conclusions whether she thinks something is funny, whether she’s smirking, or she’s just putting on a show while he speaks, not even listening.

One report on Thursday even cited her “creepy grandma’ grin.

Whatever the reason, it came at just the wrong moment during the third debate on Wednesday night: Just as Trump was talking about Islamic radicals pushing homosexuals off buildings to kill them.
 
View video and continue reading
 
Also see

isis2

image-14
 

Advertisements

Democrat exposes Hillary’s executive orders for guns

WND
By Leo Hohmann | 13 October 2016

Twitter shuts down O’Keefe as he releases new undercover video revealing 2nd Amendment plans

hqdefault

Russ Feingold, a Democrat from Wisconsin who is trying to win back his old seat in the U.S. Senate, has spilled the beans on Hillary Clinton’s strategy to remove guns from the hands of law-abiding Americans.

In an undercover video made by James O’Keefe’s Project Veritas, Feingold is seen at a $2,700 per-head fundraiser held Aug. 17 at the Palo Alto, California, home of Democratic Party donors Amy Rao and Harry Plant. Palo Alto is 10 minutes away from Stanford University, where Feingold taught after leaving his position as a special envoy at the U.S. State Department, the Washington Free Beacon reports.

Feingold can be heard in the video discussing what Hillary Clinton could do in relation to guns if she were to be elected president.

“If there’s still Republican control in Congress, and if Hillary is elected, is there anything she can do to uhhh … ?” asks the undercover journalist.

“There might be executive orders,” Feingold says.

Nearly 12 hours before releasing this video, O’Keefe’s Twitter account was locked after he announced that he would be releasing a story about a Democrat Senate candidate.

“Twitter has now locked me out unless I delete previous stories/tweets in order to get back in,” O’Keefe said in an email to WND.
 
Continue reading
 
Also see

 

Hillary’s hypocrisy on ‘black folks’

WND
By Larry Elder | 19 October 2016

What will it take for Democrats to lose the 95 percent black vote?

photo_2016-05-23_10-04-08-660x346

Hacked email to and from staffers at the Democratic National Committee and to and from John Podesta, Hillary Clinton’s campaign chairman, shows she cares far more about the black vote than black voters.

Concern for lack of diversity: One email, three months before she announced her presidential candidacy, shows Clinton’s future campaign staff mocking the criticism that it lacks racial diversity. Her then-spokesperson and future traveling press secretary Nick Merrill dismissively joked that former Bill Clinton chief of staff and future Hillary Clinton campaign director Robby Mook “claims he’s 1/16th Apache, so we should be all set.”

Earlier this year, “Frank” (identified by WikiLeaks as fwj77@comcast.net, and reported by RT.com to be Frank White Jr., who raised $2.3 million for Barack Obama in 2012) wrote to Podesta about courting black votes: “I’m hearing the same complaint in political circles that I continue to hear while fundraising. ‘The campaign doesn’t value black folks and takes us for granted.’ Can I make a suggestion? A black campaign vice chair or senior adviser would go a long way during the primary and send the message that Hillary puts her actions where her mouth is, and actually does appreciate the black vote.” Podesta replied: “Right now I think we should do this right after Super Tuesday.”

“Birtherism”: Clinton routinely attacks Donald Trump for what she calls the “racist lie” that Obama is a Muslim from Kenya. Yet a 2008 memo between a polling analyst and several people close to Clinton’s campaign – including Podesta – listed several “negatives” of her opponent, then-Sen. Obama, included the following: “Obama (owe-BAHM-uh)’s father was a Muslim and Obama grew up among Muslims in the world’s most populous Islamic country.” Just weeks ago, James Asher, former Washington bureau chief for McClatchy news, stated that during the 2008 campaign long-time Clinton confidant Sidney Blumenthal told him to investigate Obama’s African birthplace: “Blumenthal visited the Washington Bureau of McClatchy, where he and I met in my office. During that conversation and in subsequent communications, we discussed a number of matters related to Obama. He encouraged McClatchy to do stories related to Obama and his connections to Kenya.”

Ridiculing an “African-American sounding” name: Another DNC email chain shows staffers making fun of the name of a black woman named LaQueenia. Why is this noteworthy?

In recent years some academic experiments purport to show racism by showing how prospective employers discriminate against “African-American sounding names.” Never mind the same employers show similar reluctance to hire those with “white-sounding names” like “Emily” and “Todd.” And never mind that employers located in black neighborhoods also showed reluctance to hire those with “African-American sounding names.” So, if it’s “racist” to draw a negative inference from a “black-sounding name,” what is it to mock such a name?
 
Continue reading
 
Also see

 

A Frightening Preview of Hillary’s America

FrontPage Mag
20 October 2016 | By Daniel Greenfield

Dark and unaccountable.

mean-hillary-copy

Hillary Clinton, of all people, summed up this debate and this election best.

“What kind of country are we going to be?”

Are we going to be a country at all or an open border weeping undocumented migrants destroying what’s left of the middle class as the masterminds rob the country blind while preaching piously to us about all the poor Syrians, Mexicans and LGBT youth they want to protect?

Americans have had a preview of the country that Hillary Clinton would create under Obama.

Hillary Clinton promised free college and cradle to grave education that would be debt free. Americans would be the ones plummeting deeper and deeper into debt to pay for degrees in gender studies. She promised viewers pie in the sky to be paid for by higher taxes on the rich. But as Trump pointed out, that’s the class that her donors come from. Did Warren Buffett and George Soros invest all that money into her victory just to pay higher taxes? Did they do it right after they bought the Brooklyn Bridge?

Hillary talked of bringing “our country together” and not “pitting of people one against the other” and instead “we celebrate our diversity”. If she does half as good a job as Obama, these celebrations of diversity will climax with race riots across America. How exactly does Hillary plan to unite with the “deplorables” of the country? How has Hillary united anyone in the country except in disdain?

But it’s Hillary’s vision of government that is dark and unaccountable. From the beginning of the debate, she made it clear that she does not wish to be accountable to the Constitution. Her email cover up made it painfully clear that she does not want to be accountable to the American people.
 
Continue reading
 
Also see

 

 

The Clinton Record

FrontPage Mag
October 14, 2016 | By John Perazzo

A devastating exposé of the most unfit and undeserving individual ever to seek the American presidency.

crooked_hillary_house_rgb
 
Never in American history has anyone as unfit and undeserving as Hillary Clinton run for U.S. President. While she stands on the threshold of being elected to the White House, she quite literally belongs in a prison cell. This article lays out the case against her, chapter and verse.

Clinton’s Private Email Server & the Espionage Act

Throughout her entire four-year tenure as secretary of state, Mrs. Clinton never acquired or used a government email account. Instead, she transmitted — in violation of government regulations — all of her official correspondences via a private email address that traced back to a secret, private, unsecured server that was housed at her New York residence.  And immediately after those emails were subpoenaed by Congress, Clinton instructed a team of her advisers to unilaterally delete, with no oversight, almost 32,000 of the roughly 60,000 emails in question.

Clinton claimed that her reason for having used only a personal email account, rather than both a personal and a government account, was that she found it “easier,” “better,” “simpler” and more convenient to “carry just one device for my work and for my personal emails instead of two.”  It was eventually learned, however, that Mrs. Clinton in fact had used no fewer than 13 mobile devices to access emails on her private server, but the FBI was unable to obtain any of those devices in its investigation, in some cases because Clinton aides had been instructed to smash them with a hammer.
 
Continue reading
 
Also see

 

The Truth of Crooked Hillary’s Rally

Published on Sep 20, 2016

Hillary Bars Alt Press, Busses In Students to Hide Pitiful Rally Turnout. Millie Weaver catches up with Hillary Clinton in Philadelphia at her latest speaking event only to find out that Hillary staged it! At Temple University, in a building designed to hold 4600 people, campaigners claimed the event had full capacity with just over 100 attendees. Hillary “bused in” High School students as crowd filler to minimize exposure that she needed help getting upstairs, crooked Hillary, SHAME on you!

Published on Oct 5, 2016

Crooked Hillary’s rally is a sheer SCAM! Hillary’s Townhall in Haverford PA Where She Stages Question with Child Actor.

Hillary “What Difference Does It Make” Clinton

UPDATED: 5 NOVEMBER 2016

capture-57

hillary_lying

crooked-hillary-clinton-says-no-american-lives-lost-libya-benghazi-933x445

obama_hillary_muslims_ben_garrison

5zm7hs

hillary-clinton-margaret-sanger

pandering-cp-600-ci

bigot-hillary

hillarycartoon-shredder

hillary_flint_mi_water-1

hillary-emails

fat-hillary-22222222222222222

2016-09-02t22-38-28-1z-1280x720-nbcnews-ux-1080-600

Bruce Plante Cartoon: Hillary's pant suit, Secretary Hillary Clinton, email scandal, Presumptive Democratic Presidential Nominee 2016, Presidential Campaign 2016, Federal Bureau of Investigation, FBI, FBI Director James Comey, Plante 20160707

weapons-deals

cqtc__gumaa-0az

kill-people-800

hillary-jailfree-card-1

trump

george-soros-hillary

emaildeletion_small

tumblr_nz5rrqpgnj1tv8nwjo1_500

burn

factual-relationship-with-american-people

trey-gowdy-turned-loose

did-you-know-1-out-of-hillary-supported-are-just-as-stupid-as-the-other-2-funny-hillary-clinton-meme-image

 

How the Clinton Foundation Got Rich off Poor Haitians

National Review
By Dinesh D’Souza | July 18, 2016 4:00 AM

five-years-after-devastating-haiti-earthquake-protesters-want-president-martelly-to-step-down-1421091105

It filtered money through Haiti and back to itself.

EDITOR’S NOTE: The following article is excerpted from Dinesh D’Souza’s new book, Hillary’s America: The Secret History of the Democratic Party.

In January 2015 a group of Haitians surrounded the New York offices of the Clinton Foundation. They chanted slogans, accusing Bill and Hillary Clinton of having robbed them of “billions of dollars.” Two months later, the Haitians were at it again, accusing the Clintons of duplicity, malfeasance, and theft. And in May 2015, they were back, this time outside New York’s Cipriani, where Bill Clinton received an award and collected a $500,000 check for his foundation. “Clinton, where’s the money?” the Haitian signs read. “In whose pockets?” Said Dhoud Andre of the Commission Against Dictatorship, “We are telling the world of the crimes that Bill and Hillary Clinton are responsible for in Haiti.”

Haitians like Andre may sound a bit strident, but he and the protesters had good reason to be disgruntled. They had suffered a heavy blow from Mother Nature, and now it appeared that they were being battered again — this time by the Clintons. Their story goes back to 2010, when a massive 7.0 earthquake devastated the island, killing more than 200,000 people, leveling 100,000 homes, and leaving 1.5 million people destitute.

Haitians such as Andre, however, noticed that very little of this aid money actually got to poor people in Haiti. Some projects championed by the Clintons, such as the building of industrial parks and posh hotels, cost a great deal of money and offered scarce benefits to the truly needy. Port-au-Prince was supposed to be rebuilt; it was never rebuilt. Projects aimed at creating jobs proved to be bitter disappointments. Haitian unemployment remained high, largely undented by the funds that were supposed to pour into the country. Famine and illness continued to devastate the island nation.
 
Continue reading
 
Also see

 

Hillary Clinton Exposed | Hillary – The Movie

 

Hillary: The Movie is a 2008 political documentary about United States Senator and presidential candidate Hillary Clinton. It was produced by the conservative non-profit organization Citizens United. The film was scheduled to be offered as video-on-demand on cable TV right before the Democratic primaries in January 2008, but as “electioneering communication” to do so was illegal under the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act which was enforced by the Federal Election Commission. The producers went to U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia to get a declaration that they could show their movie and promotional ads for it despite BCRA. This case was titled Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission and its final decision at the U.S. Supreme Court resulted in a major change in campaign finance law.

The documentary interviewed various conservative figures such as Dick Morris and Ann Coulter and reviewed various scandals in which Hillary Clinton participated, such as the White House travel office controversy, White House FBI files controversy, Whitewater controversy, and cattle future controversy.[1] The factual finding of the three-judge district court was that there was “no reasonable interpretation [of the movie] other than as an appeal to vote against Senator Clinton”, thus making it “electioneering communication”.[2] The Supreme Court did not change that decision, but applied the strict scrutiny test for the First Amendment of the Constitution and said corporations could not be banned from making electioneering communications.[3]

In December 2007, Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission, was filed at the United States District Court for the District of Columbia. A special three-judge panel (as specified in BCRA) sided with the Federal Election Commission (FEC) that under the McCain-Feingold Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act Hillary: The Movie could not be shown on television right before the 2008 Democratic primaries.[4]

Another provision in BCRA specified that constitutional appeals from the District Court must be immediately filed directly with the U.S. Supreme Court. Citizens United did this on August 18, 2008.[5] Oral arguments were heard on March 24, 2009;[6][7][8] a decision was expected sometime in the early summer months of 2009.[9]

In 2010 the Supreme Court ruled 5–4 that the spending limits in the McCain-Feingold act were unconstitutional under the First Amendment, allowing essentially unlimited contributions by corporations and labor unions to political action committees.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hillary:_The_Movie

 
Video can also be seen here, here, and here
 
Also see