Taking Back America

…one post at a time

Tag Archives: Hillary The Movie

Hillary “What Difference Does It Make” Clinton

UPDATED: 5 NOVEMBER 2016

capture-57

hillary_lying

crooked-hillary-clinton-says-no-american-lives-lost-libya-benghazi-933x445

obama_hillary_muslims_ben_garrison

5zm7hs

hillary-clinton-margaret-sanger

pandering-cp-600-ci

bigot-hillary

hillarycartoon-shredder

hillary_flint_mi_water-1

hillary-emails

fat-hillary-22222222222222222

2016-09-02t22-38-28-1z-1280x720-nbcnews-ux-1080-600

Bruce Plante Cartoon: Hillary's pant suit, Secretary Hillary Clinton, email scandal, Presumptive Democratic Presidential Nominee 2016, Presidential Campaign 2016, Federal Bureau of Investigation, FBI, FBI Director James Comey, Plante 20160707

weapons-deals

cqtc__gumaa-0az

kill-people-800

hillary-jailfree-card-1

trump

george-soros-hillary

emaildeletion_small

tumblr_nz5rrqpgnj1tv8nwjo1_500

burn

factual-relationship-with-american-people

trey-gowdy-turned-loose

did-you-know-1-out-of-hillary-supported-are-just-as-stupid-as-the-other-2-funny-hillary-clinton-meme-image

 

Hillary Clinton Exposed | Hillary – The Movie

 

Hillary: The Movie is a 2008 political documentary about United States Senator and presidential candidate Hillary Clinton. It was produced by the conservative non-profit organization Citizens United. The film was scheduled to be offered as video-on-demand on cable TV right before the Democratic primaries in January 2008, but as “electioneering communication” to do so was illegal under the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act which was enforced by the Federal Election Commission. The producers went to U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia to get a declaration that they could show their movie and promotional ads for it despite BCRA. This case was titled Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission and its final decision at the U.S. Supreme Court resulted in a major change in campaign finance law.

The documentary interviewed various conservative figures such as Dick Morris and Ann Coulter and reviewed various scandals in which Hillary Clinton participated, such as the White House travel office controversy, White House FBI files controversy, Whitewater controversy, and cattle future controversy.[1] The factual finding of the three-judge district court was that there was “no reasonable interpretation [of the movie] other than as an appeal to vote against Senator Clinton”, thus making it “electioneering communication”.[2] The Supreme Court did not change that decision, but applied the strict scrutiny test for the First Amendment of the Constitution and said corporations could not be banned from making electioneering communications.[3]

In December 2007, Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission, was filed at the United States District Court for the District of Columbia. A special three-judge panel (as specified in BCRA) sided with the Federal Election Commission (FEC) that under the McCain-Feingold Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act Hillary: The Movie could not be shown on television right before the 2008 Democratic primaries.[4]

Another provision in BCRA specified that constitutional appeals from the District Court must be immediately filed directly with the U.S. Supreme Court. Citizens United did this on August 18, 2008.[5] Oral arguments were heard on March 24, 2009;[6][7][8] a decision was expected sometime in the early summer months of 2009.[9]

In 2010 the Supreme Court ruled 5–4 that the spending limits in the McCain-Feingold act were unconstitutional under the First Amendment, allowing essentially unlimited contributions by corporations and labor unions to political action committees.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hillary:_The_Movie

 
Video can also be seen here, here, and here
 
Also see